I wanted to know what was the difference between Shikantaza (“Just Sitting”) and Shamatha without a sign (aka, Awareness Of Awareness, AOA)… I remember listening to a podcast/retreat in which someone asked Alan Wallace about the difference between AOA and Trekchö (“Trekchö is AOA with the View”) so I was curious to know what was going on here: Is Shikantaza the same as AOA … or as Trekchö ? … Or yet something else !?
It is said that in certain cases, AOA can lead to the realisation of Pristine Awareness. Is it the same with Shikantaza ?
Shikantaza is considered an integrative practice of both Shamatha and Vipashyana, and some parallels have been drawn with Dzogchen/Mahamudra. So, I’m trying to figure out where it stands, and where it leads.
I really like Shikantaza. As Master Sheng-Yen emphasizes over and over again in “The Method of No Method” one important aspect/starting point of Shikantaza is to “sit with one’s whole body”, minding your own business, that is, being fully aware and clear about the fact that… you are sitting here! It almost sounds too simple (deceivingly, that is) but having been so disconnected from my body for years (probably due to hours and hours lost in/before screens) this practice seems to be really ideal for me, and I strongly feel drawn to Zen for its simplicity and straightforward approach. I’ve had really good results when really focusing on this “Whole Body Awareness” approach both through formal and non-formal meditation when it comes to lucid dreaming (up to 8+ a month, just through learning to stay in touch with my body. And this, while I was dealing with severe pain and emotional turmoil.) especially when topped with Illusory Form. And that’s Something Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche also talks about in Tibetan Yogas of Dream And Sleep.
But having read a lot about Shamatha (and about Alan Wallace!) I’m a bit confused about my practice and which path to choose and follow. I tend to alternate between the two. Can The Way of Zen, the practice of Zazen/Shikantaza lead to the same realization as years and years of intensive and rigorous practice that starts with Shamatha and culminates to Dzogchen ? Can it lead to the same Realisation ?
At the very least, I think starting with the practice of Shikantaza in a first place is already good beginning anyways. It’s also easier for me right now, as the pain becomes part of the meditation, while focusing on a specific object can be quite difficult as I am distracted by the pain.
But can it be a complete Path on its own ? Is it enough, “just to sit” ?
That is my question…